Friday, May 31, 2013

In America We Have A Problem I quoted and commented on portions of Charley Reese's 1984 article titled "545 people are responsible for the mess, but they unite in a common con."  Below is the orginal article taken from the Orlando Sentinel website:
 
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1984-02-03/news/os-ed-charley-reese-545-people-1984073111_1_tax-code-president-vetoes-con-game
 
February 3, 1984|By Charley Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, we have deficits? Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes?
 
You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does. You and I don't have the constitutional authority to vote [o]n appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don't write the tax code. The Congress does. You and I don't set fiscal policy, the Congress does. You and I don't control monetary policy. The Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices - 545 human beings out of 238 million- are directly, legally, morally and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Bank because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered but private central bank.

I exclude all of the special interest and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it.

No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Don't you see now the con game that is played on the people by the politicians? Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of Tip O'Neill, who stood up and criticized Ronald Reagan for creating deficits.

The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating appropriations and taxes. O'Neill is speaker of the House. He is the leader of the majority party. He and his fellow Democrats, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto.

Just 545 Americans have fouled up this great nation.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 235 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted - by present facts - of incompetence and irresponsibility.

I can't think of a single domestic problem, from an unfair tax code to defense overruns, that is not traceable directly to those people.

When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise complete power over the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.
If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red. If the Marines are in Lebanon, it's because they want them in Lebanon.

There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take it.

Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exist disembodied mystical force like "the economy," "inflation" or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people and they alone are responsible. They and they alone have the power. [T]hey and they alone should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses - provided they have the gumption to manage their own employees.

Monday, May 20, 2013

“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”   Albert Einstein

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results.”  Albert Einstein

“When you change the way you look at a thing, the thing you look at changes.”  Raymond Farrar

Our Nation faces serious challenges.

For this post I have added a third quote, which is from my friend Raymond Farrar.  In order to enjoy credible change we must be able to “see” our Nation’s politics differently.  Only then will we see it for what it truly is: the mechanism by which those who profit the most from the political process work to maintain the political status quo.

As you read, please consider how the reported actions of our political leaders is in any way getting at finding solutions to our Nation’s problems. 

Lately the news cycle has been dominated by stories about the Obama administration’s involvement/knowledge of the Benghazi attack, the IRS’s monitoring of conservative groups, and the Department of Justice’s probe into the Associated Press.  The issues have provided excellent political fodder for Republicans.  Individual politicians with an “R” beside their names are attempting to capitalize by using what POLITICO characterized as “incendiary” language to support their individual political ambitions:  “It helps Republicans raise money, get on FOX and excite conservatives.”* 

However, the “incendiary” language is problematic for the party’s leadership:

Republicans are worried one thing could screw up the political gift of three Obama administration controversies at once: fellow Republicans.  Top GOP leaders are privately warning members to put a sock in it when it comes to silly calls for impeachment or over-the-top comparisons to Watergate.  They want members to focus on months of fact-finding investigations – not rhetorical fury.

Why do GOP leaders want members “to put a sock in it” and tamp down the “rhetorical fury?”  They want to frame a strategy, with its associated themes and messages, which will maximize the party’s political gain.  Reince Preibus, Chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC) provides a clue about the strategy:

         We have to be patient, but persistent.  I think where there is smoke there is fire.  If we present ourselves to the American people as intelligent, we’re going to be in a great place as far as showing that this administration is not transparent, is obsessed with power and hates dissent.  But you don’t call for impeachment until you have evidence.

Please note that Priebus is not an elected representative.  His sole function as Chairman of the RNC is to ensure Republicans beat Democrats, period.  However, here he is shaping political strategy that elected Republican representatives are expect to follow in the interest of the Republican Party.

Priebus said the strategy would help Republicans present themselves as being “intelligent.”  What does the Republican leadership want to avoid? 

         Republican leaders privately say the best way and only way to avoid a public backlash is by using their congressional powers to aggressively investigate each matter – and let the facts carry the news, rather than stunts or rhetoric.  ‘We have stuff here that is real, so you don’t need the distraction of politics to give people an excuse to say we’re being silly,’ said a House Republican leadership aide involved in the investigations.  ‘Everyone is keenly aware of the overreach risk.’

They want to ensure people aren’t given an excuse to say Republicans are “being silly.”  They also don’t want to accusations of overreaching, which ultimately equates to political risk.  The leadership is “aware of their long history of taking scandal crusades too far, and turning damaged political figures like Bill Clinton into popular victims.”

Who else is aware?  “Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi are banking on the GOP going overboard.”  Consequently, the Republican leadership must ensure the Democratic leadership is frustrated.
 
Allen, Mike and Jim VandeHei.  “Why the GOP thinks it could blow it.”  May 16, 2013.  POLICTO.com
Retrieved from:

Tuesday, May 14, 2013


“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”   Albert Einstein

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results.”  Albert Einstein

Our Nation faces serious challenges. 

On June 16, 2011, Psychology Today carried an article titled “Don’t Blame the Politicians: Why voters lie to themselves.”  In the article Dr. Loretta Graziano Breuning states:

It’s natural to like people who smile on your dreams.  Politicians win our affection [and their elections] by encouraging our dreams.  Politicians want to please us, and we want them to please us.  Democracy means being told what you want to hear.* 

However, she goes on to point out, “If voters expect politicians to fulfill all their wishes, they are asking to be lied to.”
Dr. Breuning explains that politicians “are as flawed as the rest of us.”  Consequently, we shouldn’t blame them for our Nation’s problems because “they’re just representing their constituencies.”  We want them to tell us they can solve the problems so they oblige.

When was the last time a politician was honest and told us, “Trade-offs are part of life.  A choice that brings more of X leaves less of Y.”  Why don’t they tell us?  Because we really don’t want to hear it ourselves.  Telling us such things would create political risk, which is unacceptable when your greatest imperative is winning that next election.
That is not to say politicians are totally without blame: “Of course we need to watch politicians to make sure we don’t get swindled.  Power does corrupt.”

Then Dr. Breuning offers this caution:

… if you’re just sifting for details that fit your malicious preconceptions [confirmation bias], you’re not open to the truth.  Hostile watchdogs are not good guides to public policy.  They’re against everything except their pet panacea….      

If we cannot solve our problems using the same thinking we used when we created them, what will lead us to solutions?  As Dr. Bruening points out, “The onus is on us to have reasonable expectations.”

*Breuning, Loretta Graziano.  “Don’t Blame the Politicians: Why voters lie to themselves.”  June 16, 2011.  PsychologyToday.com  Retrieved from:

Monday, May 13, 2013


“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”  Albert Einstein

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results.”  Albert Einstein

Our Nation faces serious challenges. 

On May 9, 2013, Doug Sosnik, the political director in Bill Clinton’s White House, wrote a memorandum titled, “America…Still Looking For Change That It Can Believe In.”  Sosnik states, “…as our difficulties have grown, our leaders and public institutions have proven ill-equipped to face the challenges in front of us.”*
“The Mood Of The Country: More Anxiety Than Hope” is one of the section headings of the memo.  In it Sosnik quotes President Obama: “…all too often the institutions that give structure to our society have, at times, betrayed your trust….”  Here is the President of the United States acknowledging that our trust has been violated…the President of the United States!  Is not the office of the Presidency one of the institutions that has betrayed our trust?  Couldn’t the same be said of Congress?  Sosnik goes on to emphasize: “The betrayal of the public’s trust has contaminated the country’s mood and is the dominant influence behind the current attitudes toward elected officials and institutions in our country.” 

Where might we go from here?  As Sosnik points out, “If the current group of politicians fails to act, we are likely headed for our fourth change election in the past eight years.”  In America We Have A Problem I wrote:
"Ahhhh, don’t we just love our two-party system!  The Democratic Party and the Republican Party provide such a lovely balance in our country and work so hard for “the American people.”  I am so glad that when the ruling party is failing us we can vote and bring the other party to power to rule over us.  Then if we become dissatisfied we can return the other party to power.  Then if we become dissatisfied we can return the other party to power…and so forth and so on".

So, we “are likely headed for another change election?”   How has that been working out for us?  Why should we think a fourth change election will result in credible change when the previous three have failed? 
However, there is hope!  Sosnik explains: “This absence of leadership has created a huge opportunity for someone who is currently outside the political process, as well as a third party to fill this vacuum in 2016, particularly if Hillary Clinton does not run.”  Here Sosnik, who POLITICO characterized as “one of the Democrats’ most veteran strategists,” is saying there is an opening for an independent or third party candidate to win the Presidency in 2016. 

Where should we go from here?  Will we finally break the cycle of insanity, vote differently, and achieve a different result?  We must, but will we?

* Sosnik, Doug.  “America…Still Looking For Change That It Can Believe In”  May 9, 2013.  Retrived from:
http://images.politico.com/global/2013/05/09/sosnik_memo_59_final.html

Friday, May 10, 2013


“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”   Albert Einstein

Our Nation faces serious challenges. 

Yesterday I explained why we cannot expect those we elect to change their thinking, and their subsequent behaviors, to find long-term solutions to our Nation’s problems.  After all, their greatest concern is the imperative need to win their next election.
I also quoted Charley Reese, “When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people [536 of whom we elect] exercise complete power over the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.” 

Things are as they are because of our elected representatives.  You might contend that the nine unelected Supreme Court Justices have a say, and you would be right.  However, they have that say only after laws are passed and the Constitutionality of a given law is challenged.  
Einstein also stated, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results.”  That comment is also applicable to politics and is directly related to his quote about thinking and problem solving.  But, who does the quote apply to and how does its application affect finding solutions to our Nation’s problems? 

Every two years all 435 members of the House of Representatives and one third of the Senators must win their respective elections to remain in office.  Every four years we elect a President who is either an incumbent seeking re-election, or someone new seeking the office.
The “insanity” quote relates to voters.  We expect our representatives to do the hard work to find solutions to our Nation’s problems.  However, our voting behaviors help to maintain the political status quo.  Consequently, we overwhelmingly re-elect the same people who use the thinking, and subsequently display behaviors, discussed previously. 

Will the Nation’s problems be solved?  NO!
If we truly “expect different results” as voters, we cannot continue to use the same thinking we have used when we have voted in the past.   If we do so, we will continue to elect the very people that have created our Nation’s problems and who, as has been explained, are really incapable of finding solutions for those problems.

Since the Nation’s problems are ultimately our problems, the quote, “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them,” also applies to us.     

Thursday, May 9, 2013

“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”  Albert Einstein

Einstein was a scientist, but his comment is applicable to politics. 
Our Nation faces serious problems. 

Who created those problems?  In 1984, Charley Reese of the Orlando Sentinel wrote:

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices – 545 human beings out of 238 million [300+ million today] – are directly, legally, morally and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.  When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise complete power over the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.”
We elect 536 of those individuals: 100 Senators, 435 members of the House of Representatives and the President.  What are those individuals most concerned about?  Their greatest imperative is winning their next election.  How does that affect their thinking and subsequent behaviors?  To win they must perform the political calculus to determine which course of action will pacify the greatest number of voters in their respective constituencies.  The result is the governing process is sacrificed on the altar of politics and political expedience.  That is the thinking they used when they created the problems.      

We must rely on the same 536 individuals to find solutions to the very problems they created in the first place.  Has the imperative need to win their next elections changed?  No.  Will those individuals change their thinking, and their subsequent behaviors, to find solutions to our Nation’s problems?  No.

Will the Nation’s problems be solved?  NO!

“We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”